Network Nation
Structural profile
- Territorial claim
- Symbolic / networked
- Legal personhood
- Informal
- Decentralization
- Federated
- Scale
- Global
- Decision-making
- Consensus / deliberative
- Membership
- Values alignment
- Capital model
- Commons-pooled
- Purpose
- Civic / public good
Topology view
- DisCO: Most similar types · shares 5 of 8 attributes
- GAN: Most similar types · shares 6 of 8 attributes
- NAO: Most similar types · shares 3 of 8 attributes
- Nation-State: Most similar types · shares 1 of 8 attributes
- Network State: Most similar types · shares 3 of 8 attributes
- BrightID: Commonly used technology · Portable identity and proof of personhood
- Ethereum: Commonly used technology · Smart-contract platform
- Human Passport: Commonly used technology · Portable identity and proof of personhood
- Personhood Credentials (PHCs): Commonly used technology · Portable identity and proof of personhood
- Solana: Commonly used technology · Smart-contract platform
- Quadratic funding: Interconnected Monetary Architecture
- Governance Model
-
Blockchain-based governance tooling: soulbound tokens / Proof-of-Humanity for portable identity, DAOs for treasury management, conviction voting / quadratic funding / participatory budgeting / futarchy for decisions. The alliance describes its governance as polycentric — multiple nested, overlapping, autonomous governance bodies that coexist and coordinate — with legitimacy drawn from active participation, mutual accountability and the renegotiation of shared rules rather than a central mandate. - Legal & Territorial Status
-
Explicitly does NOT require territory (the key distinction from a Network State) — functions as a supplement to, not a replacement for, nation-states. No existing international legal category recognizes non-territorial polities of this kind. The alliance's stated aim is "functional sovereignty" — the capacity to govern essential domains of community life with a high degree of autonomy, grounded in the ability to set rules and manage resources rather than in territory — working alongside nation-states instead of replacing them. - Membership Basis
-
Chosen identity, not birthright; portable across communities; members can hold simultaneous memberships in multiple network nations (unlike exclusive nation-state citizenship). - Funding & Treasury
-
Collective crowdfunding and pooled member contributions (e.g. CityDAO's $8M+ land purchase); tokenized DAO treasury management for some examples — funding mechanisms vary by project, no single unified model. - Representative Examples
-
CityDAO (5,000+ members, 40 acres in Wyoming); Zuzalu (2-month pop-up city, Montenegro 2023); Edge City (professionalized pop-up village format); Liberland (7 km² territorial claim + Layer-1 governance).
How This Differs
Technology and money this type relies on
Its governance model relies on portable identity such as soulbound tokens and Proof-of-Humanity; the listed projects are examples of proof-of-personhood and identity tooling in the Navigator.
Its governance tooling is blockchain-based, with DAOs used for treasury management; Ethereum and Solana are listed as examples of platforms that run such contracts.
Interconnected Monetary Architecture
- Quadratic funding
Its governance tooling names quadratic funding among the mechanisms used for decisions and funding.