GAN (Global Action Network)
Structural profile
- Territorial claim
- None
- Legal personhood
- Informal
- Decentralization
- Federated
- Scale
- Global
- Decision-making
- Consensus / deliberative
- Membership
- Values alignment
- Capital model
- Dues / grants
- Purpose
- Civic / public good
Topology view
- For-Profit Corporation: Coordinates with
- Nation-State: Coordinates with
- Nonprofit Organization: Coordinates with
- DAO: Most similar types · shares 3 of 8 attributes
- DisCO: Most similar types · shares 5 of 8 attributes
- Network Nation: Most similar types · shares 6 of 8 attributes
- Network State: Most similar types · shares 4 of 8 attributes
- Governance Model
-
Multi-stakeholder governance in which no single sector dominates. The Forest Stewardship Council, which a review of Waddell's book lists as a GAN, gives environmental, social and economic chambers equal voting weight in a General Assembly of its members, which elects the board. - Legal & Territorial Status
-
No territorial claim. Participants span the governmental, nonprofit and private sectors, so the form is defined by its multi-sector membership rather than by a single legal status or jurisdiction. - Membership Basis
-
Institutional and individual participants from each sector who join around a shared issue; the FSC, for example, has over 1,000 individual and organizational members grouped into three chambers. - Funding & Treasury
-
No single treasury model is documented in the sources reviewed for this entry; funding varies by network. - Representative Examples
-
Forest Stewardship Council (which a 2011 review credits with certifying about 300 million acres of forest); the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria; the Principles for Responsible Investment.
How This Differs