Commitment pooling

Emerging Alternative Game position: Modify Accumulation: Variable Ethical frame: Rousseauian Divisibility: Undefined Uniformity: Non-fungible

Prototype: Trustlines

Treats promises between parties, not currency balances, as the thing actually tracked and cleared across a federating network of pools.

Structural profile

Topology view

Architecture

Game position
Modifies the game; commitments as primary unit, not money
Value-signal richness
Plural commitment types valued numerically or relationally
Accumulation regime
Accumulation governed by registry rules and swap limiters

Medium-of-Exchange Properties

Divisibility
Commitments aren't a divisible quantity — each one is a discrete, specific promise.
Uniformity (Fungibility)
Non-fungible by nature — plural commitment types, each specific to its own promise.
Durability
Not applicable — commitments are fulfilled and retired, not held as a durable store.
Portability
Registries federate, so commitments can move between pools, but they aren't 'spent' the way currency is.
Acceptability
Narrow — accepted within specific trust networks (Trustlines-style), inherently relational rather than universal.

Operation

Coordination / discovery
Deliberative with registry/index/limiter/treasury functions
Governance & issuance
Per-pool stewardship with cross-pool federation
Scale & federation
Designed for federation; pools confederate through registries

Anthropological assumptions

Default ethical orientation
Rousseauian; assumes capacity for promise-keeping — cooperation as the human default, not a self-interest-plus-virtue blend.
Accumulative drive
Drive moderated through registry rules and swap limiters
Status / recognition
Separated from monetary signal through plural commitment types
Time preference
Variable — a substrate of commitments and registries cleared regardless of duration, with no inherent time orientation of its own.

In Practice

Track record
Trustlines and similar commitment-pooling registries remain niche, with real but small deployments — not yet a track record of scaled adoption.
Governance requirements
Requires a trust network or registry maintaining the commitments — typically informal among known participants, formalized as the network grows.
Resource requirements
A ledger/registry system to track commitments; no capital reserve required since nothing is minted against collateral.