Mutual-credit-on-blockchain
Emerging Alternative Game position: Modify Accumulation: Variable Ethical frame: Smithian-Rousseauian Divisibility: Fine Uniformity: Fungible
Prototype: Circles UBI
Ports mutual-credit accounting onto a blockchain trust graph; some versions also mint a small universal basic income directly to participants.
Structural profile
Topology view
Architecture
- Game position
- Modifies the game; mutual credit substrate plus crypto-native features
- Value-signal richness
- Single unit per network; some designs add UBI minting
- Accumulation regime
- Varies by design: pure mutual credit zero-sum; Circles adds minting
Medium-of-Exchange Properties
- Divisibility
- Finely divisible on-chain, same precision as any standard fungible token.
- Uniformity (Fungibility)
- Fungible within a given trust-graph network, though UBI-minting variants add per-issuer complexity.
- Durability
- Durable as an on-chain ledger entry, inheriting blockchain persistence.
- Portability
- Portable within its trust-graph network; UBI-minting variants still bound acceptance to graph membership.
- Acceptability
- Narrow — accepted within the specific trust-graph a user is connected to, not universal even within the platform.
Operation
- Coordination / discovery
- Bounded-trust plus algorithmic-mechanism-design
- Governance & issuance
- Per-account or per-trust-edge issuance; protocol-level rules
- Scale & federation
- Global potential; federation through trust-graph topology
Anthropological assumptions
- Default ethical orientation
- Smithian-Rousseauian; mutual credit assumes capacity for communal trust among members, run through crypto-native infrastructure that still presumes ordinary self-interest at the edges.
- Accumulative drive
- Drive limited by mutual credit logic; some designs add minting
- Status / recognition
- Separated through trust-graph topology
- Time preference
- Variable by design — mutual credit plus optional UBI minting, with no fixed time orientation of its own.
In Practice
- Track record
-
Circles UBI has run live on-chain since 2020 , with a substantial registered user base, though actual active daily use remains a small fraction of registrations. - Governance requirements
- Requires joining a trust graph — users must be vouched for by existing members; no central authority, but real social coordination is needed to bootstrap trust.
- Resource requirements
- A blockchain wallet and gas fees to interact with the network; no capital requirement to receive the UBI issuance itself.