"DID + Verifiable History": a DID method that is the location-independent sibling of did:webvh. A did:vh identifier is only the method prefix and a self-certifying identifier (SCID) derived from the DID's first log entry, so it contains no domain name or path and is not tied to any place where its log is published. It specialises the VH-Log specification: the DID document's history is a hash-chained, signed log (did.jsonl) with optional pre-rotation of keys, witnesses and watchers. Because the DID names no location, a resolver is handed the log (or a reference to it) rather than fetching it from a well-known URL, and the SCID proves the log is the authentic history wherever it came from. Unlike did:webvh it drops the DID-to-HTTPS transformation, the portability parameter and the implicit #files and #whois services. Currently an early draft by a single editor.
LicenseThe specification is under the W3C Patent Policy (2004) terms and any sample or reference code in the repository is Apache-2.0, per the repository's licence file, which inherits them from the Decentralized Identity Foundation project charter . https://github.com/swcurran/didvh
Dev Status 📝 Draft
OwnerNo organization is named; the specification lists a single editor and is developed in a personal GitHub repository
Governing BodyNone named. Developed in the open by a single editor; related specifications VH-Log and did:webvh are separate projects
Country Not stated by the project.
Start Year 2026
StackJSON Lines DID log (did.jsonl) of signed, hash-chained entries; witness proofs in did-witness.json; did:key for witness identifiers; cryptographic agility through versioned parameters
Funding Not stated by the project.
Last Investigated Oct 29, 2026
Topology view
This tool in the centre and the things it is directly related to. Each line names the kind of relationship.
OriginsMaking self-certifying DIDs with verifiable history usable where there is no web host: peer-to-peer exchange, local files, content-addressed storage, by separating the identifier from the place its log lives
DatabaseNone: each DID's history is its own JSON Lines log, held by the controller and by whoever else copies it (peers, watchers, a web location, IPNS or a local directory)
Query LanguageNone: the resolver is passed the log (or a source reference), verifies every entry and returns the DID document
Data FormatsJSON Lines DID log (did.jsonl) of entries whose state is a W3C DID document; witness proofs in did-witness.json; parameters such as method version, update keys and next-key hashes
Mobile Support Not stated by the project.
Web SupportNot stated by the project; a log may be published at a web location, but the DID itself contains none
Native AppsNone: a draft specification
TermsFree; specification and sample code licences as above
Funds Not stated by the project.
Based OnVH-Log; did:webvh (log format, SCID, entry hashes, key authorization, pre-rotation and witnesses are those of VH-Log as used by did:webvh); W3C DID Core; did:key for witnesses
PermissionsCryptographic capabilities: only keys authorized in the log can update the DID; anyone can verify
Authentication & IdentitySelf-certifying: the DID is the SCID derived from the first log entry; entries are signed by keys the log itself authorizes; every entry's identifier must match the first entry's SCID
Storage ModelStorage-agnostic: the controller must make the log available through at least one source (peers, watchers, web locations, IPNS, a local directory), and a resolver verifies it the same way whichever way it arrived
InteroperabilityA W3C DID method in a draft; sibling of did:webvh and meant to coexist with it; the did:scid method defines a did:scid:vh format over the same log, and the spec notes a did:vh, a did:scid:vh and a did:webvh DID can never share a log or a SCID
Data PortabilityComplete by design: the DID never changes, so no portability mechanism is needed, and the same log can be served from any source
Governance & Decision MakingNot described: the specification is a personal draft with no process stated
Protocol Maturity / StandardizationEditors Draft v0.1 ("Pre-Draft"); no standards body is named, no implementation or test suite is linked, and it is not in the W3C DID Extensions registry
Identity StandardsW3C DID Core; VH-Log; did:key for witness identifiers
Key ManagementKeys authorized in the log; optional pre-rotation by publishing hashes of the next keys (the spec says controllers should use it); updates signed by an authorized key
Credential TypesN/A: a DID method; it defines no credential types
Verification MethodA resolver verifies every log entry (entry hash, SCID, authorized-key signatures, pre-rotation and witness proofs where used) and checks that each entry's identifier is did:vh plus the first entry's SCID
Privacy FeaturesDescribed in the spec's privacy considerations, covering surveillance and correlation and the right to erasure; the log is append-only, so history cannot be erased
Authentication MethodsSignatures by keys the log authorizes; witnesses can approve updates before publication
Revocation MechanismDeactivation by setting the deactivated parameter or emptying the update keys; the history is kept
Agent Types SupportedAny key-controlling entity
Wallet/Client TypesNone yet: no implementation is linked
Recovery MechanismsPre-rotation commitments (optional, recommended) let a controller recover from a compromised active key
Compliance / RegulationsThe spec has a section on the right to erasure under GDPR Article 17
Credential Exchange ProtocolsN/A: a DID method; its logs can be exchanged peer-to-peer in the manner of did:peer
Trust FrameworkCryptographic: the SCID and the entry hashes bind the log to the identifier; optional witnesses and watchers add third-party checks; no registry or authority
Cost ModelFree: no registry or host is required
Censorship ResistanceHigh by design: there is no authoritative location, so nobody can block resolution by controlling a host; availability still depends on someone holding a copy of the log
Relationships
How this tool connects to other tools and organizations, from relationships reviewed by the OpenHaven data steward. They describe how projects connect, not how good they are.