Anonymous Credentials: a verifiable-credential format that uses zero-knowledge proofs, so a holder can prove claims from credentials without revealing the credentials or a correlatable identifier. An issuer publishes a schema and a credential definition (with a public key), signs a credential for a holder, and can publish a revocation registry; the holder later produces a proof that discloses only chosen attributes or predicates (for example 'over 18') and proves the credential is not revoked, linking multiple credentials through a hidden master secret. The specification formalises an implementation in use since 2017, first in Hyperledger Indy and now the Hyperledger AnonCreds project, now hosted at the LF Decentralized Trust. The v1.0 draft aims to be ledger-agnostic .
LicensePermissive: code under Apache-2.0; the specification text under the Community Specification License 1.0. https://github.com/anoncreds/anoncreds-spec; https://github.com/anoncreds/anoncreds-rs (Rust reference implementation)
Dev Status 🟢 Active
OwnerLF Decentralized Trust (Hyperledger AnonCreds project; the GitHub organisation 'anoncreds' describes itself as an LF Decentralized Trust project); the specification's editors include Stephen Curran, Sam Curren and others from IDunion and the Technische Universität Berlin
Governing BodyLF Decentralized Trust, AnonCreds Project (charter and maintainer process in the anoncreds/governance repository)
CountryInternational (an LF Decentralized Trust project; editors named across several organisations; the cited sources give no single country)
Start Year 2017
StackRust reference library (issuer, prover/holder, verifier services) with bindings; CL-signature-based zero-knowledge proofs; schema, credential definition, revocation registry and status-list objects published to a verifiable data registry of the implementer's choice
Funding Not stated by the project.
Last Investigated Oct 29, 2026
Topology view
This tool in the centre and the things it is directly related to. Each line names the kind of relationship.
Animo (Tool): Conforming implementations, Protocol spoken by
did:cheqd (Tool): Conforming implementations, Protocol spoken by
did:indy (Tool): Conforming implementations, Protocol spoken by
Sovereign identity Portable attestations Contextual disclosure
Identity Protocol Attributes
OriginsPrivacy-preserving credentials for self-sovereign identity, originating in the Hyperledger Indy project and generalised so the credentials no longer depend on one ledger; based on the 'Anonymous credentials with type-3 revocation' work by Khovratovich, Lodder and Parra
Database N/A
Query Language N/A
Data FormatsAnonCreds objects (schema, credential definition, revocation registry definition and status list, credential offer, request, credential, presentation) as JSON; the specification defines each object
Mobile SupportLibrary-level: the Rust library has bindings used by wallet applications; no application of its own
Web SupportLibrary-level only
Native AppsLibrary-level: the Rust library is embedded in wallets and agents
TermsFree and open: code under Apache-2.0 and the specification under the Community Specification License 1.0
Funds Not stated by the project.
Based OnThe Hyperledger Indy credential implementation and Camenisch-Lysyanskaya signatures, with type-3 revocation (Khovratovich, Lodder, Parra); the v1.0 draft removes the dependency on one ledger
PermissionsIssuers decide who receives credentials; holders decide what to disclose; verifiers decide which proofs to accept
Authentication & IdentityA holder proves possession of credentials with zero-knowledge proofs bound to a hidden link secret; no global identifier is revealed to the verifier
Storage ModelSchemas, credential definitions and revocation objects are published to a verifiable data registry (originally an Indy ledger, now any supported registry); credentials are held by the holder
InteroperabilityUsed with Aries-style agents and a number of registries; the specification calls itself ledger-agnostic in v1.0; interoperability with W3C Verifiable Credentials data models is addressed by separate profiles outside the cited sources
Data PortabilityCredentials are held by the holder and can be presented to any verifier that supports the format; they are bound to the issuer's published definition
Governance & Decision MakingProject charter and maintainer processes in the anoncreds/governance repository; the specification is the output of the AnonCreds Working Group's consensus
Protocol Maturity / Standardizationv1.0 Draft specification under a community specification licence, with a reference implementation and years of deployment; not a W3C or IETF standard
Identity StandardsPredates and differs from W3C Verifiable Credentials (it uses its own zero-knowledge format); related to W3C DID practice through Aries and registries
DID Methods SupportedRegistry-dependent; originally did:sov and Indy-based methods, with registry-agnostic identifiers in v1.0 (details are in the specification)
Key ManagementThe issuer holds the credential-definition private key; the holder keeps a link secret; keys are managed by the implementing wallet or agent
Credential TypesZero-knowledge verifiable credentials with revocation; attributes encoded as integers
Verification MethodThe verifier checks a zero-knowledge presentation against the published credential definition and revocation status list, including predicates and non-revocation proofs
Privacy FeaturesZero-knowledge selective disclosure and predicates, unlinkable presentations, and link-secret binding so multiple credentials prove one holder without a shared identifier
Authentication MethodsZero-knowledge proofs of credential possession; the issuer authenticates through its published definition
Revocation MechanismType-3 accumulator-based revocation registries with status lists; the holder proves non-revocation without revealing the credential
Agent Types SupportedIssuers, holders (provers) and verifiers: individuals, organisations and devices
Wallet/Client TypesWallets and agents that embed the library; the project's own code is a library
Recovery Mechanisms Not stated by the project.
Compliance / Regulations Not stated by the project.
Credential Exchange ProtocolsCredential offer, request and presentation flows defined in the specification; messaging is carried by the surrounding agent protocols
Trust FrameworkTrust in issuers' published credential definitions on a verifiable data registry, with the verifier choosing which issuers to accept
Cost ModelFree to use; registry publication costs depend on the chosen registry
Censorship ResistanceModerate: verification needs only the published definition, but publishing and revocation depend on the chosen registry
Relationships
How this tool connects to other tools and organizations, from relationships reviewed by the OpenHaven data steward. They describe how projects connect, not how good they are.